Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSchjelderup, Guttorm
dc.contributor.authorEggert, Wolfgang
dc.date.accessioned2006-08-03T06:56:19Z
dc.date.available2006-08-03T06:56:19Z
dc.date.issued2004-09
dc.identifier.issn0804-6824
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/162876
dc.description.abstractThis paper shows in a symmetric tax competition model that a formula apportionment system can attain the first best welfare optimum without any political pre-agreed harmonization or coordination of tax bases and tax rates. The same result cannot be obtained under separating accounting even if countries agree on both tax rates and bases. The efficiency of company tax reform therefore requires more political cohesion under separate accounting than formula apportionment and yields lower welfare.en
dc.format.extent178925 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherNorwegian School of Economics and Business Administration. Department of Economicsen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDiscussion paperen
dc.relation.ispartofseries2004:24en
dc.titleCorporate tax systems and cross country profit shifting : formula apportionment vs. separate accountingen
dc.typeWorking paperen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record