Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBjorvatn, Kjetil
dc.contributor.authorCappelen, Alexander W.
dc.date.accessioned2006-08-09T09:09:57Z
dc.date.available2006-08-09T09:09:57Z
dc.date.issued2002-12
dc.identifier.issn0804-6824
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/162878
dc.description.abstractThis paper analyses the welfare effects of a change from centralized to decentralized political authority. The potential disadvantage with decentralization in our model is that local dominant groups with rather “extreme” preferences may win the vote and implement policies that harm the well-being of local minorities. When the national median voter represents a “moderate” position, centralization can be seen as a way of protecting the interests of local minorities. Our main result is that the centralized solution may welfare dominate decentralization even in the absence of scale economics and interregional spillovers. We also demonstrate that increased segregation, increased mobility, and increased heterogeneity in preferences, factors that are normally considered to be arguments in favor of decentralization, may reduce the attractiveness of the decentralized solution from a welfare perspective. Finally, we show that when the national median voter is an “extreme” type, decentralization may represent a way of protecting local minority interests.en
dc.format.extent131028 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherNorwegian School of Economics and Business Administration. Department of Economicsen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDiscussion paperen
dc.relation.ispartofseries2002:22en
dc.titleDecentralization and the fate of minoritiesen
dc.typeWorking paperen


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel