Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCappelen, Alexander W.
dc.contributor.authorHalvorsen, Trond
dc.contributor.authorSørensen, Erik Ø.
dc.contributor.authorTungodden, Bertil
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-14T12:27:39Z
dc.date.available2013-03-14T12:27:39Z
dc.date.issued2013-02
dc.identifier.issn0804-6824
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/163338
dc.description.abstractWe study the relative importance of intrinsic moral motivation and extrinsic social motivation in explaining behavior in the dictator game. We introduce a novel design that manipulates these two dimensions. The paper offers four main findings. First, intrinsic moral motivation is of fundamental importance. Second, extrinsic social motivation matters and is crowding-in with intrinsic moral motivation. Third, extrinsic social motivation generates behavior consistent with some participants being motivated by guilt and shame and others by social esteem and pride. Fourth, sharing behavior in the dictator game is strongly associated with charitable giving outside the lab and with political preferences.no_NO
dc.language.isoengno_NO
dc.publisherNorwegian School of Economics, Department of Economicsno_NO
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDiscussion paper;5/2013
dc.titleFace-saving or fair-minded : what motivates moral behavior?no_NO
dc.typeWorking paperno_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Social science: 200::Economics: 210::Economics: 212no_NO


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record