dc.contributor.author | Bivand, Roger S. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-03-15T12:42:21Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-03-15T12:42:21Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011-11 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0804-6824 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11250/163356 | |
dc.description.abstract | Elhorst (2010) shows how the recent publication of LeSage and Pace (2009)
in his expression “raises the bar” for our fitting of spatial econometrics models.
By extending the family of models that deserve attention, Elhorst reveals
the need to explore how they might be fitted, and discusses some alternatives.
This paper attempts to take up this challenge with respect to implementation in
the R spdep package for the maximum likelihood case, using a smaller data set
to see whether earlier conclusions would be changed when newer techniques
are used, and two larger data sets to examine model fitting issues. | no_NO |
dc.language.iso | eng | no_NO |
dc.publisher | Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Economics | no_NO |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Discussion Papers;22/2011 | |
dc.title | After “Raising the Bar”: applied maximum likelihood estimation of families of models in spatial econometrics | no_NO |
dc.type | Working paper | no_NO |
dc.subject.nsi | VDP::Social science: 200::Economics: 210::Economics: 212 | no_NO |