Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStensholt, Eivind
dc.date.accessioned2008-06-24T13:06:13Z
dc.date.available2008-06-24T13:06:13Z
dc.date.issued2008-06
dc.identifier.issn1500-4066
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/163935
dc.description.abstractThe strategy most damaging to many preferential election methods is to give insincerely low rank to the main opponent of one’s favorite candidate. Theorem 1 determines the 3-candidate Condorcet method that minimizes the number of noncyclic profiles allowing this strategy. Theorems 2, 3, and 4 establish conditions for an anonymous and neutral 3-candidate single-seat election to be monotonic and still avoid this strategy completely. Plurality elections combine these properties; among the others "conditional IRV" gives the strongest challenge to the plurality winner. Conditional IRV is extended to any number of candidates. Theorem 5 is an impossibility of Gibbard-Satterthwaite type, describing 3 specific strategies that cannot all be avoided in meaningful anonymous and neutral elections.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherNorwegian School of Economics and Business Administration. Department of Finance and Management Scienceen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDiscussion paperen
dc.relation.ispartofseries2008:10en
dc.titleVoces populi and the art of listeningen
dc.typeWorking paperen
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Statsvitenskap og organisasjonsteori: 240en


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record