Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorIsaksen, Elisabeth Thuestad
dc.contributor.authorÅrdal, Janne
dc.date.accessioned2009-11-26T12:36:40Z
dc.date.available2009-11-26T12:36:40Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/168313
dc.description.abstractStandard models of electoral competition predict that countries with large income differences will have a high degree of redistribution. Empirical evidence, on the other hand, finds the opposite relationship to be true. The inverse relationship between income inequality and redistribution is known as the ―redistribution puzzle‖. In this paper we explore possible explanation to this puzzle by focusing on differences between the US and Europe. Our empirical analysis shows that racial diversity serves as an important explanation to the puzzle. Based on data from the General Social Survey (GSS) we find that racial diversity, in addition to having a direct negative impact on support for welfare also has an indirect effect on welfare support by affecting important behavioural and psychological factors. We find that a high degree of racial heterogeneity is associated with lower levels of trust and negative perceptions about the poor. Our analysis further suggests that contact across races might contribute to reduce negative attitudes, and increase the support for welfare. However, the causality of this relationship is unclear.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.titleInequality, redistribution and racial heterogeneityen
dc.typeMaster thesisen
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Økonomi: 210::Samfunnsøkonomi: 212en


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record