Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorForos, Øystein
dc.contributor.authorKind, Hans Jarle
dc.contributor.authorShaffer, Greg
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-14T09:55:00Z
dc.date.available2014-05-14T09:55:00Z
dc.date.issued2014-04
dc.identifier.issn1503-2140
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/194997
dc.description.abstractThe agency model used by Apple and other platform providers such as Google allows upstream rms (content providers like book publishers and developers of apps) to choose the retail prices of their products (RPM) subject to a xed revenue-sharing rule. We show that (i) this leads to higher prices if the competitive pressure is higher downstream than upstream; (ii) upstream rms earn positive surplus even when platform providers have all the bargaining power; and (iii) with asymmetric business formats (where only some platform providers use the agency model), a retail most-favored-nation clause leads to retail prices that resemble the outcome under industry-wide RPM.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherSNFnb_NO
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking paper;06/14
dc.subjectVDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Økonomi: 210::Samfunnsøkonomi: 212nb_NO
dc.subjectthe agency modelnb_NO
dc.subjectresale price maintancenb_NO
dc.subjectmost-favored nation clausesnb_NO
dc.subjectrevenue sharingnb_NO
dc.titleTurning the page on business formats for digital platforms : does Apple's agency model soften competition?nb_NO
dc.typeWorking papernb_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel