Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMele, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorMolnar, Krisztina
dc.contributor.authorSantoro, Sergio
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-09T08:36:52Z
dc.date.available2018-11-09T08:36:52Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn0804-6824
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2571725
dc.description.abstractThe main advantage of price level stabilization compared with in ation stabilization rests on the central bank's ability to shape expectations. We show that stabilizing prices is no longer optimal when the central bank can shape expectations of agents with incomplete knowledge, who have to learn about the policy implemented. Disin- ating in the short run more than agents expect generates short-term gains without triggering an abrupt loss of confidence, because agents update expectations sluggishly. Following this policy, in the long run, the central bank loses the ability to shape agents' beliefs, and the economy converges to a rational expectations equilibrium in which policy does not stabilize prices, economic volatility is high, and agents suffer the corresponding welfare losses. However, these losses are outweighed by short-term gains from the learning phase.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherInstitutt for samfunnsøkonomi, NHHnb_NO
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDP SAM;22/2018
dc.titleOn the perils of stabilizing prices when agents are learningnb_NO
dc.typeWorking papernb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200nb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber35nb_NO


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record