Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSlettli, Viktoriia Konovalenko
dc.contributor.authorBourmistrov, Anatoli
dc.contributor.authorGrønhaug, Kjell
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-07T11:26:37Z
dc.date.available2019-06-07T11:26:37Z
dc.date.created2018-04-09T13:40:04Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationElectronic Journal of Knowledge Management. 2018, 16 (2), 99-112.nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1479-4411
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2600338
dc.description.abstractSeveral challenges face the notion of accountability in the context of non-profit organizations. Included among these are multiple principle stakeholders with different objectives, interests, and level of influence, as well as output that is intangible or difficult to measure. In order to align stakeholders’ contradictory interests, for-profit organizations employ market mechanisms. The non-profit sector, however, lacks this type of regulation. It is suggested that governing bodies should adopt the responsibility of aligning various interests with the mission of the non-profit organization. This paper addresses the issue of accountability for intellectual capital in the context of a non-profit organization using the case of Severstal Corporate University. It approaches accountability by examining accountability practices that are socially constructed in their settings in terms of accountability relationships, the content of accounts, and justification mechanisms. The study suggests that accountability is constructed through the interaction of two subjects: ‘spaces’ and ’logics’. The study contributes to the research on accountability for IC in non-profits by demonstrating how the mechanisms of customer feedback, reputation and ‘corporate rumors’ can be used in the alignment function of the governing bodies. Furthermore, the study contributes to the field of IC by suggesting a new framework/guidance for the organizations that do not use IC reporting but nonetheless want to provide stakeholders with IC information.nb_NO
dc.description.abstractConstructing accountability for intellectual capital in accountability settings: coupling of spaces and logicsnb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.rightsAttribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectaccountabilitynb_NO
dc.subjectintellectual capitalnb_NO
dc.subjectspacesnb_NO
dc.subjectlogicsnb_NO
dc.subjectsettingsnb_NO
dc.subjectcorporate universitynb_NO
dc.titleConstructing accountability for intellectual capital in accountability settings: coupling of spaces and logicsnb_NO
dc.title.alternativeConstructing accountability for intellectual capital in accountability settings: coupling of spaces and logicsnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionnb_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Social science: 200::Economics: 210::Economics: 212nb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber99-112nb_NO
dc.source.volume16nb_NO
dc.source.journalElectronic Journal of Knowledge Managementnb_NO
dc.source.issue2nb_NO
dc.identifier.cristin1578355
cristin.unitcode191,20,0,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for strategi og ledelse
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal