Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorJuranek, Steffen
dc.contributor.authorZoutman, Floris T.
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-29T11:22:58Z
dc.date.available2020-04-29T11:22:58Z
dc.date.issued2020-04-29
dc.identifier.issn1500-4066
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2652920
dc.description.abstractUnderstanding the effectiveness of social distancing on the spread of COVID-19 is crucial to justify economically costly social distancing measures. We present a case study focusing on the three Scandinavian countries. Whereas Denmark and Norway imposed relatively strict measures, Sweden follows an extraordinarily lenient approach. We use an event-study approach in which Sweden serves as a counterfactual to Denmark/Norway to estimate the measures’ effectiveness. We estimate that in the counterfactual in which Denmark/Norway implemented Sweden’s more lenient measures the number of hospitalizations would have peaked between around 15-20 days later. The peak number of hospitalizations in Denmark (Norway) would have been 133 (231) percent higher, and the peak number of ICU patients would have increased by 107 (140) percent.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherFORen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDiscussion paper;2/20
dc.subjectCOVID-19en_US
dc.subjectSocial Distancingen_US
dc.subjectIntensive Careen_US
dc.subjectCase Studyen_US
dc.titleThe Effect of Social Distancing Measures on Intensive Care Occupancy: Evidence on COVID-19 in Scandinaviaen_US
dc.typeWorking paperen_US
dc.source.pagenumber13en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel