Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStensholt, Eivind
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-31T08:19:02Z
dc.date.available2020-08-31T08:19:02Z
dc.date.issued2020-08-31
dc.identifier.issn1500-4066
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2675622
dc.description.abstractWith the present (2020) tally rules, the number of seats in the Bundestag is highly volatile. In 2017 it got 709 seats, 111 of them extra-ordinary. The tally rules may double the influence of a voter who splits the vote; the proportionality requirement may multiply an unfortunate side effect by a high factor. The paper explains when and how this happens. A ballot’s combination of Erststimme and Zweitstimme is information that now is ignored; the tally is as if Erststimme and Zweitsimme were collected in different ballot boxes. The suggested faithful accounting uses this information. With 2017 data, it is estimated that the number of extra-ordinary seats would have been reduced by about 74, to 37. Tallying 2017 data with present rules and CDU/CSU as one party reduces the size by 42 seats; combined with faithful accounting, the reduction is more than 74.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherFORen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDiscussion paper;10/20
dc.subjectMixed member proportionalen_US
dc.subjectequal influenceen_US
dc.subjectlegitimacyen_US
dc.subjectassembly sizeen_US
dc.titleMixed Member Proportional; equal influence and assembly sizeen_US
dc.typeWorking paperen_US
dc.source.pagenumber15en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record