Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBivand, Roger
dc.contributor.authorHauke, Jan
dc.contributor.authorKossowski, Tomasz
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-11T11:15:34Z
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-12T07:44:44Z
dc.date.available2015-03-11T11:15:34Z
dc.date.available2015-03-12T07:44:44Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationGeographical Analysis 2013, 45(2):150-179nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0016-7363
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/278934
dc.descriptionThis is the accepted version of the following article:Computing the Jacobian in Gaussian Spatial Autoregressive Models: An Illustrated Comparison of Available Methods,Geographical Analysis 2013, 45(2):150-179, which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gean.12008/abstract. © 2013 The Ohio State Universitynb_NO
dc.description.abstractWhen estimating spatial regression models by maximum likelihood using spatial weights matrices to represent spatial processes, computing the Jacobian, ln(|I - lW|), remains a central problem. In principle, and for smaller data sets, the use of the eigenvalues of the spatial weights matrix provides a very rapid resolution. Analytical eigenvalues are available for large regular grids. For larger problems not on regular grids, including those induced in spatial panel and dyadic (network) problems, solving the eigenproblem may not be feasible, and a number of alternatives have been proposed. This article surveys selected alternatives, and comments on their relative usefulness, covering sparse Cholesky and sparse LU factorizations, and approximations such as Monte Carlo, Chebyshev, and using lower-order moments with interpolation. The results are presented in terms of componentwise differences between sets of Jacobians for selected data sets. In conclusion, recommendations are made for a number of analytical settings.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherJohn Wiley and Sonsnb_NO
dc.titleComputing the Jacobian in Gaussian Spatial Autoregressive Models: An Illustrated Comparison of Available Methodsnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.date.updated2015-03-11T11:15:34Z
dc.source.pagenumber150-179nb_NO
dc.source.volume45nb_NO
dc.source.journalGeographical Analysisnb_NO
dc.source.issue2nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/gean.12008
dc.identifier.cristin1024303


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel