Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHapnes, Erik
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-15T13:01:25Z
dc.date.available2015-09-15T13:01:25Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/300066
dc.description.abstractIn this paper the result of Adrian, Etula, and Muir (2014) is reexamined. They propose a model with nancial intermediary leverage that is able to price a set of portfolios remarkably well. In this paper the model is estimated with di erent portfolios as test assets. This is done to account for recent critiques of the use of size and book-to-market sorted portfolios as test assets. This paper uses two new sets of portfolios, industry portfolios and portfolios sorted on size and pre-formation leverage beta. The proposed model with nancial intermediaries is not able to explain the variation of cross-sectional average returns on the two new sets of portfolios.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.subjectEconomic analysisnb_NO
dc.titleAsset returns and financial intermediary leverage : an emprical analysisnb_NO
dc.typeMaster thesisnb_NO
dc.description.localcodenhhmasnb_NO


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record