Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEkström, Mathias
dc.contributor.authorSjåstad, Hallgeir
dc.contributor.authorBjorvatn, Kjetil
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-26T09:22:15Z
dc.date.available2024-09-26T09:22:15Z
dc.date.issued2024-09
dc.identifier.issn0804-6824
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3154481
dc.description.abstractTo mitigate global warming, collective behavior change is needed. But which tools should policymakers prioritize: economic incentives, nudges, or a combination? Current evidence from social science provides little direct advice, as it either lacks credible identification of causality or objective long-term behavioral data. Addressing both limitations, we present causal evidence from a two-year field experiment, comparing how a small price incentive and a social norm-nudge affect the recycling behavior of more than 2,000 households. The results show a large, immediate, and persistent positive effect of incentives on both the quantity and quality of recycling, but no effect of the norm-nudge. However, the price incentive reduced customer satisfaction, unless it was combined with the norm-nudge, suggesting that appealing to norms can make climate incentives more acceptable.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherInstitutt for samfunnsøkonomien_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDP SAM;15/2024
dc.subjecteconomic incentivesen_US
dc.subjectnudgesen_US
dc.subjectbehavior changeen_US
dc.subjectnorm-nudgeen_US
dc.titleCreating pro-environmental behavior change: Economic incentives or norm-nudges?en_US
dc.typeWorking paperen_US
dc.subject.nsiSamfunnsvitenskapen_US
dc.source.pagenumber37en_US
dc.relation.projectNorges Forskningsråd: 262675en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record