Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorRygg, Kristin
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-23T11:17:37Z
dc.date.available2016-06-23T11:17:37Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationSYNAPS - A Journal of Professional Communication 27(2012)nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1893-0506
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2393870
dc.descriptionThis article is based on the compulsory trial lecture in connection with the defense of my doctoral thesis (June 2012).nb_NO
dc.description.abstractThe terms distance and proximity are not only linked to nonverbal space but also to verbal (in)directness and politeness theories. In this article, I examine what linguistic and rhetorical devices are used to express distance or proximity in social interactions, and why some are better equipped to signal one or the other. Further, these theories are compared to Norwegian and Japanese language and values. Whereas vertical distance is especially important in directing Japanese politeness, Norwegians’ limited use of politeness devices may be unintentionally interpreted as impolite, but could also be understood as a sign of respect for personal space.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherNHHnb_NO
dc.title(In)directness – Distance or Proximity?nb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber54-66nb_NO
dc.source.volume27nb_NO
dc.source.journalSYNAPS - A Journal of Professional Communicationnb_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel