Consistency in Terminological Choice: Holy Grail or False Prophet?

dc.contributor.author	Rogers, Margaret
dc.date.accessioned	2016-09-05T07:39:51Z
dc.date.available	2016-09-05T07:39:51Z
dc.date.issued	2008
dc.identifier.citation	SYNAPS - A Journal of Professional Communication 21(2008) pp.107-113	nb_NO
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2404147
dc.description.abstract	The aim of this contribution is to problematise the notion of consistency in relation to terminological choice in the context of technical writing and translation. It is argued that the conventional wisdom of terminological consistency can be nuanced through an understanding of ‘motivatedness’ which is rooted in textuality.	nb_NO
dc.language.iso	eng	nb_NO
dc.publisher	NHH	nb_NO
dc.title	Consistency in Terminological Choice: Holy Grail or False Prophet?	nb_NO
dc.type	Journal article	nb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber	107-113	nb_NO
dc.source.volume	21	nb_NO
dc.source.journal	SYNAPS - A Journal of Professional Communication	nb_NO