Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHopland, Arnt Ove
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-10T12:43:36Z
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-10T11:50:06Z
dc.date.available2014-10-10T12:43:36Z
dc.date.available2015-02-10T11:50:06Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationNordic Journal of Surveying and Real Estate Research 2014, 10(1):7-22nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1459-5877
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/275728
dc.descriptionOpen Journal Systemsnb_NO
dc.description.abstractUp to the mid-1990s almost all Norwegian local governments had a decentralized structure on their facility management. Over the following 15 years a swift centralization followed, and in 2010 roughly 85% of the local governments used a centralized structure. Centralization is in accordance with the recommendation from a government commission studying the topic, but the arguments are not unambiguous. This paper formulates a stylized model for the relationship between facility management and production of welfare services. The model suggests that it is not obvious that a centralized structure is superior for all local governments, but that this may depend on local factors. Consistent with the predictions from the stylized model, the empirical findings suggest that large local governments with a weak political leadership centralize their facility management, while small local governments with a strong political leadership prefer a decentralized structure.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherThe Finnish Society of Surveying Sciencesnb_NO
dc.titleOne size fits all? Facility management in Norwegian local governmentsnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.date.updated2014-10-10T12:43:36Z
dc.source.pagenumber7-22nb_NO
dc.source.volume10nb_NO
dc.source.journalNordic Journal of Surveying and Real Estate Researchnb_NO
dc.source.issue1nb_NO
dc.identifier.cristin1151356


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel