• norsk
    • English
  • English 
    • norsk
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Norges Handelshøyskole
  • Thesis
  • Master Thesis
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Norges Handelshøyskole
  • Thesis
  • Master Thesis
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Differentiation of secondary brand benefit associations : Are preferred brands any different?

Ellefsen, Bettina Therese Rognås; Krogstad, Torbjørn Furu
Master thesis
Thumbnail
View/Open
Masterthesis.pdf (10.74Mb)
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11250/276163
Date
2014
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Master Thesis [4657]
Abstract
The brand management literature focuses on differentiation of brand benefits. However,

associative network theory has taught us that associations do not have independent meaning,

but receive its content from surrounding nodes, i.e. secondary associations. Thus, we must

study secondary brand benefit associations (SBBAs) in order to learn more about

differentiation.

We compared the SBBAs of preferred and acceptable brands using a randomized 4 (car-,

beer-, grocery store- and clothing store categories) x 2 (preferred- and acceptable brands)

factorial between subjects design. Furthermore, we investigated whether the same effects

apply for products and services, thus providing a new and important contribution to the

research on differentiation. The experiment was conducted online, with a sample of 818

current and former students at the Norwegian School of Economics.

In accordance with the traditional view on brand differentiation, our experiment only

investigated SBBAs with positive valence. We focused on four dimensions of

differentiation: The first is the number of positive SBBAs. Secondly, instrumental

differentiation is specific evidence for why a brand is better than the competitors on a driver.

Finally, graded differentiation is to what extent a secondary association is shared with other

brands, where dichotomous differentiation implies that it is solely connected to the brand.

The results of our main study show that preferred brands had a higher number of positive

SBBAs for both products and services. While only services had preferred brands with a

higher score on instrumental- and graded differentiation. We also used regression analyses to

test whether our differentiation dimensions could explain any variance in evaluations of

brand benefits. Results showed that instrumental differentiation had a positive effect for

product brands, whereas graded differentiation had a positive effect for service brands. The

number of positive SBBAs had a positive effect for all brands, hence supporting the

traditional view on brand differentiation.

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit
 

 

Browse

ArchiveCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournalsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournals

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit