• norsk
    • English
  • English 
    • norsk
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Norges Handelshøyskole
  • Thesis
  • Master Thesis
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Norges Handelshøyskole
  • Thesis
  • Master Thesis
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

How do Alternative Asset Classes Affect Performance of Traditional Stock & Bond Portfolios? An Empirical Analysis of Strategic Asset Allocation and Risk Management through Business Cycles

Søraas, Espen André; Heimstad, Ivar Fjelde
Master thesis
Thumbnail
View/Open
masterthesis.pdf (3.020Mb)
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2781304
Date
2021
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Master Thesis [4657]
Abstract
The main scope of this thesis is to examine how alternative asset classes affect performance

of traditional stock and bond portfolios. We will employ financial engineering and

quantitative analytics to construct the most optimal portfolio of asset classes from 1928 –

2020 and investigate the diversification effect of alternative asset classes. The methodology

to find an optimal portfolio follows the prominent mean-variance framework of Harry

Markowitz, which determines portfolio weights to maximize the return-to-risk ratio. The

analyzed asset classes are U.S. equity, government bonds, corporate bonds, gold, real estate,

commodities, options strategies and factor exposure towards Fama-French’ SMB, HML

and UMD portfolios.

The purpose of utilizing 93 years of data is to construct a portfolio which performs in every

stage of the business cycle. It should handle inflation and deflation, rising and falling interest

rates, as well as market booms and crashes. Quadratic optimization suggests an allocation

of government bonds, corporate bonds, real estate, UMD factor exposure and a covered call

option strategy. This combination leads to a significant improvement of risk management,

where the risk exposure is halved compared to a traditional stock and bond portfolio

without influencing returns. The optimal portfolio achieves an annual alpha of 3.40%

compared to our benchmark, and Sharpe ratio increases from 0.397 to 0.835. As the riskadjusted

return is significantly improved, will our research suggest that including

alternative asset classes enhances portfolio quality.

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit
 

 

Browse

ArchiveCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournalsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournals

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit