Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSørgard, Lars
dc.contributor.authorDaljord, Øystein
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-27T10:17:13Z
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-27T11:06:12Z
dc.date.available2015-08-27T10:17:13Z
dc.date.available2015-08-27T11:06:12Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationInternational Review of Law and Economics 2011, 31(2):142-146nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0144-8188
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/298073
dc.description-This is preprint version of the article "Single-product versus uniform SSNIPs" International Review of Law and Economics Volume 31, Issue 2, June 2011, Pages 142–146.nb_NO
dc.description.abstractIt is common to apply a SSNIP test with a uniform price increase on all products in the candidate market. We show that in situations with asymmetries – for example variations in revenues – a uniform SSNIP test may suggest that the relevant market should include more products even though it could be profitable to increase the price of only one product in the candidate market. Our results are illustrated with some findings from a survey in a local grocery market.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherElsevier B.Vnb_NO
dc.subjectSSNIPnb_NO
dc.subjectmarket delineationnb_NO
dc.subjectasymmetriesnb_NO
dc.titleSingle-product versus uniform SSNIPsnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.date.updated2015-08-27T10:17:13Z
dc.source.pagenumber142-146nb_NO
dc.source.volume31nb_NO
dc.source.journalInternational Review of Law and Economicsnb_NO
dc.source.issue2nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.irle.2011.04.001
dc.identifier.cristin826216


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel