• norsk
    • English
  • English 
    • norsk
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Norges Handelshøyskole
  • Thesis
  • Master Thesis
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Norges Handelshøyskole
  • Thesis
  • Master Thesis
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

CBAM – Steering the World Trade to Fit the Future

Aarrestad, Anniken; Nytrøen, Signe Ellevold
Master thesis
Thumbnail
View/Open
masterthesis.pdf (2.222Mb)
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2985921
Date
2021
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Master Thesis [4207]
Abstract
A Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, also known as CBAM, is a policy proposed by the

European Commission as a part of “Fit for 55” - an intermediate goal along the way to achieve

the final goal of the European Green Deal: climate neutrality within 2050. The increased

ambition level of the EU consists, among others, of phasing out free allowances and decreasing

the overall cap of quotas in the EU ETS. Additionally, the Commission has proposed to

introduce a CBAM. The CBAM will strive to prevent carbon leakage, protect the

decarbonization initiatives in the EU/EFTA, incentivize third country producers to reduce

emissions, and ensure that the price of imports to the EU/EFTA reflects their carbon content.

In this thesis, we focus on Norway and analyze the effects, on both imports and production,

when implementing the CBAM at the EU/EFTA border. First, we analyze the effects in the

EU/EFTA aluminum market when both phasing out the free allowances and phasing in the

CBAM. Second, we analyze the direct impacts of the CBAM on the imports of cement,

fertilizer, iron & steel, and aluminum to Norway.

We find that EU/EFTA producers and third country producers with low carbon intensities will

be able to capture additional market shares as a consequence of the CBAM. This will cause a

reduction in consumption-related emissions in the EU/EFTA. Whether total greenhouse gas

emissions are reduced globally depends on whether foreign producers increase their ambition

levels in line with the EU/EFTA. Furthermore, we calculate the direct impacts of the CBAM

on Norwegian imports, comparing the effects of including scope 1 emissions versus scope 1+2

emissions in the policy. For both alternatives, the CBAM tariff will eliminate the most carbonintensive

goods from the Norwegian imports. The cement sector is hit the hardest in relative

terms, while the carbon content of imports is reduced the most in absolute terms in the

aluminum sector. However, we find that the inclusion of scope 2 in the CBAM imposed on

imports at the Norwegian border will not increase the efficiency of the policy.

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit
 

 

Browse

ArchiveCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournalsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournals

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit