• norsk
    • English
  • English 
    • norsk
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Norges Handelshøyskole
  • Thesis
  • Master Thesis
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Norges Handelshøyskole
  • Thesis
  • Master Thesis
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Doing well while doing what? An empirical analysis of exclusionary screening of the Norwegian Pension Fund Global on excluded companies’ returns from 2005 to 2022

Eide, Serina; Haugen, Susann
Master thesis
Thumbnail
View/Open
masterthesis.pdf (5.312Mb)
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3051827
Date
2022
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Master Thesis [4207]
Abstract
This thesis investigates whether the excluded companies from the Norwegian Government

Pension Fund Global (“GPFG” - “The Fund”) investment universe delivers superior excess

returns (alpha). The ethical-based exclusionary screening of the GPFG, as the world’s largest

stock owner and one of the most transparent sovereign wealth funds in the world, provides a

sample of stocks that face widespread exclusions by other institutional investors. We construct

sub-portfolios based on criteria for exclusion, if companies belong to developed or emerging

markets, and economic sector affiliation. The performance implications of these portfolios are

investigated from September 2005 to August 2022.

In our performance regressions, we apply the Fama-French five-factor model to estimate

superior excess returns (alphas) and to control for possible differences in risk exposure

between the excess returns of sub-portfolios and the market index used by the GPFG. We find

statistically significant and positive alpha estimates of 19 out of 26 sub-portfolios. The results

of this thesis indicate that companies excluded based on their products delivers superior excess

returns, and the outperformance cannot be explained by sector-specific effects. Altogether, our

findings are in line with previous research suggesting that exclusionary screening harms

financial performance in this period, and thus the GPFG as a responsible investor are

sacrificing financial returns. Our analysis suggest that the Fund has had a loss of USD 8.24

billion from 2005 to 2022. We note that the findings of this paper may be affected by the

methodological choice.

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit
 

 

Browse

ArchiveCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournalsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournals

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit