Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.advisorPelzl, Paul
dc.contributor.authorRossi, Paolo
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-12T08:22:29Z
dc.date.available2023-09-12T08:22:29Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3088798
dc.description.abstractThis paper investigates the reasons that lead companies to introduce Internal Carbon Pricing as a way to internalize the impact of their GHG emissions in their processes. In order to do this, the usage of Internal Carbon Pricing (ICP) is observed across European industries and public carbon pricing policies. The analysis is based on the answers that organizations provided to the CDP 2021 Climate Change questionnaire, as well as insight from interviews held with some of the companies. This analysis found a strategic use of Internal Carbon Pricing, with varying goals behind its adoption across industries, depending on the degree of regulation they are subject to. Highly regulated and emission-intensive sectors use ICP as a means of evaluating and stress-testing their investments. In contrast, less regulated industries tend to use ICP as a way to meet stakeholder expectations and demonstrate their commitment to climate goals and efforts.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.subjectenergy, natural resources and the environmenten_US
dc.titleWhy constrain yourself? A cross-industry analysis of Internal Carbon Pricing in relation to the regulatory framework.en_US
dc.typeMaster thesisen_US
dc.description.localcodenhhmasen_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel