Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorHaug, Jørgen
dc.contributor.authorSkaug, Oskar Flagtvedt
dc.contributor.authorSandvik, Eirik
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-07T12:42:15Z
dc.date.available2024-05-07T12:42:15Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3129509
dc.description.abstractOur analysis reveals an average monthly size effect of 1.29 percent on the Oslo Stock Exchange from 2000 to 2020, a significance that persists after adjusting for various systematic risk factors. Despite substantial exposure to the Small Minus Big (SMB) factor, our findings suggest it cannot fully account for the observed effect. Our liquidity analysis indicates a tendency for liquid stocks to outperform illiquid stocks of similar size, although the evidence is inconclusive. Examination of liquidity risk demonstrates that the size effect is exposed to systematic liquidity risk, yet conclusive results are hindered by robustness concerns and potential model biases. Our investigation reveals an average size effect in January of 12.08 percent and no significant returns observed from February to December. This highlights that the size effect is concentrated exclusively in January. Furthermore, indications suggest that market turmoil and uncertainty impact the effect, although conclusive results cannot be ascertained. Lastly, we find a negative correlation between market liquidity and the size effect, posing potential implications for the execution of trading strategies based on the size effect and offering insight into the persistence of the effect.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.subjectfinancial economicsen_US
dc.titleBigger isn’t always better : A twenty-one-year study of the size effect on the Oslo Stock Exchangeen_US
dc.typeMaster thesisen_US
dc.description.localcodenhhmasen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record