Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAlstadsæter, Annette
dc.date.accessioned2006-06-22T11:11:47Z
dc.date.available2006-06-22T11:11:47Z
dc.date.issued2004-02
dc.identifier.isbn82-491-0312-2 (trykt versjon)
dc.identifier.issn0803-4036
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/165167
dc.description.abstractThe dual income tax provides the sole proprietor with large incentives to participate in tax minimizing income shifting to have more of his income taxed as capital income. The Norwegian split model is designed to remove these incentives, but it contains loopholes. The present paper concludes that the split model to some extent counteracts the negative effect of technology risk on the level of real capital in the sole proprietorship. But the split model also induces the sole proprietor to over-invest in less risky real capital. In addition, the widely held corporation serves as a tax shelter for the sole proprietor. The higher the business income and the higher the difference between the marginal tax rates on labour, the larger the incentives to incorporate.en
dc.format.extent429033 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherSNFen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesReporten
dc.relation.ispartofseries2004:2en
dc.titleThe sole proprietor’s income shifting under the dual income taxen
dc.typeResearch reporten


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record