Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorNarbel, Patrick A.
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-14T07:35:28Z
dc.date.available2014-05-14T07:35:28Z
dc.date.issued2014-04
dc.identifier.issn1500-4066
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/194987
dc.description.abstractIntermittent renewable energy sources, including solar and wind power, typically remain more expensive than conventional power sources. As a consequence, few intermittent power projects would have been deployed if speci c policy instruments had not been implemented. Existing policy instruments facilitating the deployment of intermittent renewable energy technologies include the feed-in tari , the feed-in premium and the quota system. Based on a numerical analysis, it is shown that these speci c policy instruments do not necessarily facilitate the deployment of valuable energy sources because they ignore the cost of inter- mittency. A valuable intermittent energy source is de ned here as a source of energy which requires little nancial support and which limits the need for capacity payments in order to ensure the security of supply. Based on insights from the numerical analysis, a new policy instrument is suggested: a multiplicative premium. This type of policy instrument would increase the likelihood that valuable intermittent energy assets are deployed in priority.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherFORnb_NO
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDiscussion paper;17/14
dc.subjectintermittent renewablesnb_NO
dc.subjectvalue of energynb_NO
dc.subjectsecurity of supplynb_NO
dc.titleRethinking how to support intermittent renewablesnb_NO
dc.typeWorking papernb_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel