Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHannesson, Rögnvaldur
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-14T13:58:29Z
dc.date.available2018-12-14T13:58:29Z
dc.date.issued2018-12-13
dc.identifier.issn1500-4066
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2577808
dc.description.abstractProduction of a renewable substitute to fossil fuels is modeled as causing the cost of this backstop technology to fall over time in proportion to the scale of the substitute production and how long it has been in use. The unit cost of resource extraction is assumed to rise as the stock is depleted, so learning by doing will increase the reserves permanently left in the ground. The green paradox can nevertheless be present, in the sense that the resource extraction path can initially lie above what it would be in the absence of a parallel production of renewable energy. In a monopolistic market, the resource monopolist’s optimal price path is two-phased, even with inelastic demand. In the limit-pricing phase, the price is falling, due to the progressive learning by doing effect, and the extraction path is rising.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherFORnb_NO
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDiscussion paper;17/18
dc.subjectGreen Paradoxnb_NO
dc.subjectcarbon dioxide emissionnb_NO
dc.subjectfossil fuelsnb_NO
dc.titleThe Green Paradox and learning by doingnb_NO
dc.typeWorking papernb_NO
dc.source.pagenumber9nb_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel