Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorChronopoulos, Michail
dc.contributor.authorHagspiel, Verena
dc.contributor.authorFleten, Stein-Erik
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-13T11:21:44Z
dc.date.available2015-02-13T11:21:44Z
dc.date.issued2015-02-13
dc.identifier.issn1500-4066
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/276263
dc.description.abstractThe relationship between uncertainty and managerial flexibility is particularly crucial in addressing capital projects. We consider a firm that can invest in a project in either a single (lumpy investment) or multiple stages (stepwise investment) under price uncertainty and has discretion over not only the time of investment but also the size of the project. We confirm that, if the capacity of a project is fixed, then lumpy investment becomes more valuable than a stepwise investment strategy under high price uncertainty. By contrast, if a firm has discretion over capacity, then we show that the stepwise investment strategy always dominates that of lumpy investment. In addition, we show that the total amount of installed capacity under a stepwise investment strategy is always greater than that under lumpy investment.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherFORnb_NO
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDiscussion paper;10/15
dc.subjectinvestment analysisnb_NO
dc.subjectcapacity sizingnb_NO
dc.subjectflexibilitynb_NO
dc.subjectreal optionsnb_NO
dc.titleStepwise Investment and Capacity Sizing under Uncertaintynb_NO
dc.typeWorking papernb_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel