Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSchei, Vidar
dc.contributor.authorRognes, Jørn K.
dc.contributor.authorMykland, Solfrid
dc.date.accessioned2007-06-28T08:22:26Z
dc.date.available2007-06-28T08:22:26Z
dc.date.issued2002-11
dc.identifier.issn1503-5093
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/164292
dc.description.abstractThis article examines how individual differences in cognitive motivation and positive affect influence the outcome in integrative dyadic negotiations. The cognitive motivation and positive affect of 64 participants were measured prior to a simulated negotiation. At the individual level, high cognitive motivation strongly improved the outcome for the sellers, but not for the buyers. When cognitive motivation was low, positive affect enhanced the quality of the outcome for the sellers. The dyadic outcome was positively affected by both the individual difference variables. Cognitive motivation was more important than positive affect, and characteristics of the sellers were more important than those of the buyers.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherNorwegian School of Economics and Business Administration. Department of Strategy and Managementen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDiscussion paperen
dc.relation.ispartofseries2002:2en
dc.titleThinking deep and feeling good : cognitive motivation and positive affecten
dc.typeWorking paperen
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Psykologi: 260::Organisasjonspsykologi: 268en


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record