Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBreivik, Einar
dc.contributor.authorThorbjørnsen, Helge
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-08T10:37:16Z
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-20T07:57:02Z
dc.date.available2015-05-08T10:37:16Z
dc.date.available2015-05-20T07:57:02Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science 2008, 36(4):443-472nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn0092-0703
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/283766
dc.description-“This is the author’s accepted manuscript. The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11747-008-0115-z.© Academy of Marketing Science 2008"nb_NO
dc.description.abstractMany studies have proposed the use of the relationship metaphor to enhance the understanding of the relationship between consumers and brands. However, few studies have empirically tested consumer–brand relationship models. In this paper, the authors argue that the success of developing empirical models of consumer–brand relationships depends on the adequacy of the metaphoric transfer. The authors compare two models of consumer–brand relationships—the brand relationship quality (BRQ) model and the relationship investment (RI) model on the basis of empirical fit and model interpretation. They modify both models to better accommodate less involving relationships and test them in two studies. The findings suggest that the modified RI model offers a straightforward interpretation of consumer–brand relationships that vary in intensity. The results from the BRQ model are less clear, though further refinements of the model demonstrates the increased potential of the BRQ model compared with traditional attitude models to explain relationships between consumers and brands.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherSpringer Linknb_NO
dc.subjectconsumer - brand relationshipsnb_NO
dc.subjectmetaphoric transfernb_NO
dc.subjectmodel comparisonnb_NO
dc.subjecthabit persistencenb_NO
dc.titleConsumer brand relationships: an investigation of two alternative modelsnb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.date.updated2015-05-08T10:37:16Z
dc.source.pagenumber443-472nb_NO
dc.source.volume36nb_NO
dc.source.journalJournal of the Academy of Marketing Sciencenb_NO
dc.source.issue4nb_NO
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11747-008-0115-z
dc.identifier.cristin833403


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel