Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorNesheim, Torstein
dc.contributor.authorKalleberg, Arne L.
dc.contributor.authorOlsen, Karen Modesta
dc.date.accessioned2006-06-21T07:03:00Z
dc.date.available2006-06-21T07:03:00Z
dc.date.issued2005-01
dc.identifier.issn1503-2140
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/165440
dc.description.abstractRecent research on non-standard employment relations indicates that these arrangements may be a source of innovation and competitive advantage for the firm. In this paper, we analyze firms’ motives for using two types of employment intermediaries (consultancy firms and temporary help agencies) in their core activities. We hypothesize that consultancy firms are used mainly by firms that pursue an innovation strategy or demand special competence, while temporary help agencies are used by firms that compete on low cost or require numerical flexibility. We find empirical support for these hypotheses in a sample of 501 firms in six information and communication industries in Norway. Our results suggest that consultancy firms, rather than temporary help agencies, are the main providers of knowledge and innovation capability from outside organizations’ boundaries.en
dc.format.extent87168 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherSNFen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking paperen
dc.relation.ispartofseries2005:2en
dc.titleExternalizing the Core : explaining firms’ use of employment intermediaries in the information- and communication technology industriesen
dc.typeWorking paperen


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel