Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorGabrielsen, Tommy Staahl
dc.date.accessioned2006-06-22T07:20:12Z
dc.date.available2006-06-22T07:20:12Z
dc.date.issued2005-02
dc.identifier.issn1503-2140
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/166452
dc.description.abstractIn this paper we investigate some of the most frequent arguments for the use of slotting allowances. It has been claimed that slotting allowances can be profitability used to increase retail profits at the cost of increasing consumer prices. A second argument is that slotting allowances can be used by producers of new product to signal the demand potential of their products. We find that in a perfect information setting slotting allowances will never arise in equilibrium. Moreover, we question whether slotting allowances can serve as a signalling device. We argue that buy-back clauses are far better instruments to signal profitability of new product launches in the grocery sector. Implications for innovation and competition policy are discussed.en
dc.format.extent159737 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherSNFen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking paperen
dc.relation.ispartofseries2005:50en
dc.titleSlotting allowances and buy-back clausesen
dc.typeWorking paperen


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel