Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHyytinen, Ari
dc.contributor.authorSteen, Frode
dc.contributor.authorToivanen, Otto
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-13T08:20:10Z
dc.date.available2014-02-13T08:20:10Z
dc.date.issued2013-12
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/166760
dc.description.abstractWe study cartel contracts using data on 18 contract clauses of 109 legal Finnish manufacturing cartels whose legal status is reminiscent of e.g. the U.S Sugar Institute. One third of the clauses relate to raising profits; the others deal with instability through incentive compatibility, cartel organization, or external threats. Cartels use three main approaches to raise profits: Price, market allocation, and specialization. These appear to be substitutes. Choosing one has implications for how cartels deal with instability. Simplifying, we find that cartels economize on contract clauses, cartels in homogenous goods industries allocate markets, and small cartels avoid competition through specialization.no_NO
dc.language.isoengno_NO
dc.publisherSNFno_NO
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking paper;49/13
dc.subjectcartelsno_NO
dc.subjectcontractsno_NO
dc.subjectantitrustno_NO
dc.subjectcompetition policyno_NO
dc.subjectindustry heterogeneityno_NO
dc.titleAnatomy of cartel contractsno_NO
dc.typeWorking paperno_NO
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Social science: 200::Economics: 210::Economics: 212no_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel