Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBrekke, Kurt R.
dc.contributor.authorHolmås, Tor Helge
dc.contributor.authorMonstad, Karin
dc.contributor.authorStraume, Odd Rune
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-21T11:28:58Z
dc.date.available2018-11-21T11:28:58Z
dc.date.issued2018-09
dc.identifier.issn1503-2140
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2574101
dc.description.abstractWe analyse the effects of fee-for-service versus fixed salary on the treatment decisions of general practitioners (GPs) and on patients’ health outcomes. Using rich Norwegian register data during 2009-2013, we find that GPs respond strongly and consistently to changes in remuneration type. Compared with fixed salary, GP payment by fee-for-service leads to an increase in the supply of consultations and a higher provision of medical services (along several dimensions) per consultation. This has also significant implications for patients’ health outcomes, with a close to 20 percent reduction in the probability of an emergency hospital admission shortly after a GP consultation.nb_NO
dc.language.isoengnb_NO
dc.publisherSNFnb_NO
dc.titleHow does the type of remuneration affect physician behaviour? Fixed salary versus fee-for-servicenb_NO
dc.typeWorking papernb_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel